I think the attendance was the biggest story. They're claiming 29,000 attended. Does anybody believe that? It looked like 10-15 thousand max. Mediocre team, pathetic schedule, surly curmudgeon of a coach (who refuses to recruit...) what is the best Adjective to describe the state of UCLA football...I think the lack of fans suggests " Irrelevant "
I think the attendance was the biggest story. They're claiming 29,000 attended. Does anybody believe that? It looked like 10-15 thousand max. Mediocre team, pathetic schedule, surly curmudgeon of a coach (who refuses to recruit...) what is the best Adjective to describe the state of UCLA football...I think the lack of fans suggests " Irrelevant "
I think the attendance was the biggest story. They're claiming 29,000 attended. Does anybody believe that? It looked like 10-15 thousand max. Mediocre team, pathetic schedule, surly curmudgeon of a coach (who refuses to recruit...) what is the best Adjective to describe the state of UCLA football...I think the lack of fans suggests " Irrelevant "