Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bruin4ever's avatar

Well, at least the Bruins didn't lose as badly to the #1 team in the country (48-10) as they did against #2 Indiana (56-6)... :-)

But a dumpster fire is still a dumpster fire. The UCLA football program still awaits the hiring of yet another new HC who will try to bring success in spite of the incompetence and dysfunction that persists within the UCLA administration. Such a toxic environment can make the HC job opening at UCLA less appealing to any highly competent and promising candidates out there, but perhaps a huge salary with favorable buyout terms are enough to persuade any desirable new hire to accept the challenge. The next HC also knows they'll have to somehow expand NIL funding capability while competing against local rival U$C for recruits and transfers. In any case, the HC search committee has to get it right this time and not rely just on familiarity, past ties to UCLA, and/or HCs promising 6-8 win seasons to preserve mediocrity and jelly donuts. Still hoping/dreaming that a new AD is in the works (firing with cause), maybe in conjunction with announcing the hiring of a new HC? Otherwise, there's apparently not enough high voltage to shock Frenkenstein into taking any action and we'll just have to suffer and wait for him to retire and/or when the jelly donut AD contract finally ends (6/30/2029). Ugh!

paulieg896's avatar

Were we embarrassed? What did anyone expect out of this game? 48-10 seems to be par for the course for anyone facing ohio state this year. Especially with Nico out , I was just happy to not get shutout

28 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?