Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Uclastepup's avatar

This was really good read, its not under a firewall. It goes over details that were discussed on this board including how UCLA is historically a top 20 program, which I believe a 100%.

https://247sports.com/college/ucla/Article/UCLA-Football-After-Finally-Seeing-This-UCLA-Team-Decently-Good-But-Not-Great-192646465/

Expand full comment
Jeffro_TBS's avatar

I think the verdict is still out. Some questions for sure on the O line and Defense, but I don’t think we’ll really know until mid-season. On the bright side it was good to see Kaz get more touches and Keegan looks like a nice secondary back. Charbonet is still a beast. DTR….hmmm…still inconsistent. flashes of the ‘bad’ DTR, running backwards, throwing a bad pick, and then the more mature and composed version shows up and really takes contrLo of the O. I’m worried about the close game where we need a clutch field goal. In some games I can see us going for it on 4th down rather than trust Barr-Mira.

Pac-12 had a shocker today. Hard to call it a power 5 conference.

We want Bama! (state or south, not those other guys)

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts