7 Comments
User's avatar
тна Return to thread
gbruin's avatar

The second biggest asset is that this could get UCLA to go in for real on men's and women's ice hockey.

Expand full comment
Evan's avatar

not if IX has anything to say about it (on the men's front)

Expand full comment
Dimitri Dorlis's avatar

I imagine if you add both sports at the same time, it would be fine.

Expand full comment
gbruin's avatar

Yup, and I know 1 D1 level women's player on her way to UCLA this fall. ;-)

Expand full comment
Evan's avatar

logically, that is how Title IX should work. But it's not.

Expand full comment
Clio 98's avatar

Right - due to football, since there's no equivalent "pair" with it (baseball-softball, &c) when it comes to scholarship numbers so in many cases on many campuses, fewer men's Olympic sports are offered or have fewer scholarships to better even out the numbers

Expand full comment
Evan's avatar

that and other instances of legal gymnastics that the Dept. of Education and federal judiciary have bestowed on us.

Expand full comment