Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Cam's avatar

"There are a few things to point to in the aftermath of what feels like the most frustrating loss of the season for the Bruins, but I want to start with a bit of a contrarian opinion: UCLA’s offense was not the reason they lost this game. The Bruins shot 45.1% from the field in the game, and even in the second half when Minnesota staged its comeback UCLA still shot 45.5%."

Just looking at these stats out of context isn't really fare to call this a "slow but still efficient night." UCLA shot 5-15 from the FT line in the second half (33%). Missing 3 front end of 1-1s and missing both FTs at least twice. Those should been seen as empty possessions as well and really more than anything I think are the reason this is an L.

Expand full comment
UCLA4EVER's avatar

All of this analysis, particular about not playing Mara and Perry, is off point. UCLA lost because they could not hit a free throw in the second half and had they hit even 50%, they would have won. Perry and Mara were playing terrible, hurting the team, when they were in and to speculate that in the second half they would become productive is unrealistic speculation. Got to trust Cronin on that. This is not the first loss due to choking on crucial free throws and I would like to say Cronin has to work on that but I do not know how one changes chocking--hypnosis? Garcia who I think leads the Big10 in scoring went off in the second half just like Watkins did against our ladies and when somebody gets crazy hot like that, not much you can do about it--it happens.

Expand full comment
62 more comments...

No posts