So funny how they are touting Lunardi as getting 67 of 68 correct. Like 64 of those were baked in. He basically had to choose 4 out of 10 bubble teams to get in and he picked 3. Big Deal. A lot of his seedlings (also not that hard) are way off. They acting like he picked an entire bracket perfectly.
So funny how they are touting Lunardi as getting 67 of 68 correct. Like 64 of those were baked in. He basically had to choose 4 out of 10 bubble teams to get in and he picked 3. Big Deal. A lot of his seedlings (also not that hard) are way off. They acting like he picked an entire bracket perfectly.
One more statement on how Lunardi compares to his peers. Ranking above based on previous 5 seasons. For 2023, Lunardi ranked 120 out of 292 bracketologists.
Yeah he sucks. But who are these тАЬpeers.тАЭ ItтАЩs actually a science with not much subjectivity to predict what the committee will do, at least with who gets in. ThereтАЩs always like 4-6 teams competing for 2-3 spots.
So funny how they are touting Lunardi as getting 67 of 68 correct. Like 64 of those were baked in. He basically had to choose 4 out of 10 bubble teams to get in and he picked 3. Big Deal. A lot of his seedlings (also not that hard) are way off. They acting like he picked an entire bracket perfectly.
He's ranked 88 out of 148 bracketologists.
I'm far more stunned that there are 148 bracketologists to be ranked!
IтАЩm stunned that there are even 5
That doesn't include another 64 newbies that are ranked separately.
One more statement on how Lunardi compares to his peers. Ranking above based on previous 5 seasons. For 2023, Lunardi ranked 120 out of 292 bracketologists.
Yeah he sucks. But who are these тАЬpeers.тАЭ ItтАЩs actually a science with not much subjectivity to predict what the committee will do, at least with who gets in. ThereтАЩs always like 4-6 teams competing for 2-3 spots.