Discussion about this post

User's avatar
UCLA4EVER's avatar

Not having Latu playing is a tremendous hit for the defense. His absence will make a good run defense less effective and certainly will be missing his pass rushing. Murphy is a big step down. There is also the mental and momentum factor. At the end of the Cal game, UCLA's morale looked at a low point of the season and Chip's "I do not care", arrogant attitude is unlikely to rally the troops. I agree with Joe expecting a loss but it really does not matter losing in the Toilet Bowl. Retaining Chip is a total nightmare. I cringe at thinking what will happen next season when the Bruins will be under dogs in every game except, perhaps, the Hawaii game.

Expand full comment
Clio 98's avatar

Alum and season ticket holder since the mid-90s as a student who also didn't buy bowl tickets as a personal protest, not just due to the decision to retain chip (I mean even the dysfunctional chargers figured out that his NFL doppelganger had to go!) but also because of what I saw at the Rose Bowl against UC Berkeley. Sure I've seen lots of bad football as Joe so adroitly put it but that can be forgiven... What is unforgivable is quitting mid-game. The only other time I can remember a Bruin team quitting like that was 2001 at the mausoleum when the team that was the first ever BCS #1 got derailed by the DeShawn new truck scandal and clearly couldn't have cared less by the time they played $outhern Cal to end the season...

Quitting is the ultimate insult by an athlete and the ultimate demonstration that a coach has lost their team. And a rot that must be stopped - I feel bad for those who didn't and won't but I can't get past it to go watch it again, even locally.

Go BRUINS

Expand full comment
6 more comments...

No posts