Sunday Morning Quarterback: UCLA Needs to End its "Chip Fatigue"
It's time for Martin Jarmond to put his stamp on UCLA football.
After last week’s loss to Southern Cal, I was somewhat willing to accept the loss and the fact that Chip Kelly would be back for another season next year because of the financial issues facing the UCLA Athletic Department.
Then, last night happened.
Now, today, I’m tired. I’m suffering from a case of “Chip Fatigue.” I’m over Chip Kelly.
I’m tired of watching the Bruins lose. I’m tired of listening to Chip Kelly not answer questions. I’m tired of UCLA not being eligible to go to bowl games. I’m tired of UCLA coaches who fail to turn the program around. I’m tired of UCLA being in the bottom of the conference standings.
I just want the Bruins to win.
And, when I think about the progress this year’s team has shown, I am led to questions about what could have been. This year’s team was arguably a handful of plays away from being undefeated. Instead, they finished an underwhelming 3-4.
In at least three of those games, it was bad in-game management and play calling by Chip Kelly and the coaching staff which resulted in those losses.
That, coupled with the results in the previous two seasons, have led me to conclude that Martin Jarmond needs to consider doing something to improve the program in the long-term. If he can raise the money to buy out Chip’s contract, he should probably do it.
That’s before considering the state of recruiting.
To be sure, UCLA’s results during the Early Signing Period were much better than expected. But I don’t get why there seem to be so many Bruin fans who are jumping for joy with a middle of the conference recruiting class. Is it because recruiting has been so terrible under Kelly until now? Why is everyone forgetting about the talent level which came into the program under Rick Neuheisel and Jim Mora?
That’s where UCLA’s recruiting should be. Accepting mediocre recruiting efforts because it wasn’t supposed to be even this good is about equivalent to accepting “moral victories” and those are never acceptable.
Three losing seasons combined with three so-so recruiting classes should be grounds for dismissal. Period. I don’t care if our Athletic Director was only here for one of each of those. He needs to look at the totality of the job that Kelly has done — and it isn’t good.
In fact, the only thing that could potentially save Kelly’s job at this point is the department’s financial situation.
On the other hand, if Chip wants out of Westwood, he should consider negotiating a much lower buyout fee which Kelly can afford. If Kelly wants to leave, I’d say look at Kelly’s paystubs and offer to let him go in return for what he was paid this year after taxes, probably around $3 million.
Heck, if Kelly’s agent drives a hard bargain, I might even consider settling for less or even nothing. Let him walk.
Then, make those Urban Meyer rumors that Jarmond dispelled last week come to reality. And, if Meyer who already works part of the week in LA for Fox doesn’t want to make it an everyday thing, go out and get either an up-and-coming head coach in a non-Power 5 conference….cough, cough, Luke Fickel, cough, cough…or a coordinator not named Sarkisian from one of the football powerhouses to come to LA.
But, please, for the love of UCLA, I hope that Jarmond does something to end the mediocrity associated with Bruin football.
Go Bruins.
Thanks again for supporting The Mighty Bruin. Your paid subscriptions make this site possible. Questions, comments, story ideas, angry missives and more can be sent to to @TheMightyBruin on Twitter.
Yes. Fire Chip Kelly! He's made an ass of himself and made the program a dumpster fire. 10-21 record is dogshit.
OK, don't take this wrong but.... why would an elite coach want to coach a team that has dismal fan support? You all are great fans BUT... UCLA gets way more pumped up for basketball season than football season.
I've been on campus during a weekend game and I'm not kidding, the students seem unaware there is a game on the schedule. I think the problem is that the Rose Bowl, while beautiful, is not close enough. Students need to walk to the games, not drive. If UCLA can build a stadium (and no, it looks like that's not feasible) then you aren't going to bring the students in.
Most football programs have fans tailgate around the stadium near the campus. They go to the bookstore and buy last minute spirit wear and then wear it to the games after walking over to the stadium. UCLA fans have to drive to their stadium... it's not a quick drive and it's a lot of traffic.
UCLA has got to figure out how to win with the coach they have. That will bring up fan base support. THEN you can negotiate for an elite coach. Until that happens, I don't see Meyer or Fickel coming your way. LA is one of the most expensive places in which to to live. You can make $3 million elsewhere with more money in the bank left over.
Also, UCLA has a recent history of failed coaches. There's always that one coach who thinks he can turn things around BUT... history is not on its side. Off the top of my head, I cannot think of one coach in the last 20 years that someone else just had to steal from UCLA. Terry Donahue was great. His three predecessors were lured away to other coaching positions (two NFL and one coach's alma mater). But after Donahue? Crickets chirping.
To recap, don't fire Chip. Let him give the program stability. Otherwise, UCLA is going to be known as the place where head coaches' dreams die. Like Nebraska.
Has Chip earned your respect? Probably not. He has a horrible record. But other things need to change before you can attract an elite coach. You need to have that short list and dialogue with the short list candidates. You have to know who they would feel if the job was offered. You cannot fire a head coach and THEN start looking for a replacement.
I was VERY leery of the Chip Kelly hire. The NCAA sanctions were a red flag. Plus, his zone read offense was no longer unique nor indefensible. Still, I'm surprised his record is not at least .500.
Maybe he's lost that edge?