Discussion about this post

User's avatar
gbruin's avatar

This is a fairly underwhelming hire to me, but I wasn't in the interviews, so that's just my 40,000 foot view of it. But mostly thank god they didn't settle for Flack or Shaw or some other retread. Foster may have what it takes to re-energize this program, but I don't see that he has any resumé for rebuilding a program. I probably would have preferred Rees or White in that regard, but Foster does have some of the same attributes and intangibles that made those guys attractive candidates.

Since he's the choice, let's see how things go for the next year or two. If Foster's ceiling looks good, then fantastic. If he looks to be in over his head, we have every reason and right to move on quickly.

Expand full comment
Ed's avatar

He was a great running back for UCLA. Dorrel and Neuheisel were also great players for UCLA, but neither panned out as a head coach. I do not know how Foster will do as a first time head coach. But for certain, we must get behind him to win!

Expand full comment
134 more comments...

No posts