Discussion about this post

User's avatar
gbruin's avatar

I'm with you on this one, DD. In a year like this, if we focus only on W's and L's, we're doomed to be disappointed. What players and coaches do, as opposed to many fans, is focus on getting better. Granted, this program has a myriad of areas that need to get better, but there should be a degree of encouragement after today.

While I expect Garbers will be back when he is healthy, Martin to me has an enormously higher ceiling and should be starting going forward. His arm is way better. His vision of the field is better. His decisions seemed better. He needs to work on his footwork as he threw off his back foot too much but given the consistent pressure our QBs face, you understand his lack of confidence in the pocket.

And a lot of the QB/offense play was dependent on the OC. When the play called for a short drop and quick read and throw, it was effective. Conversely, when the play called for a 5 step drop and long developing pass routes, the O Line just can't hold up long enough, and neither Martin nor Garbers will stand a chance in those situations (screens work great in these circumstances, Bieniemy, by the way...). I don't know if EB intentionally simplified things for Martin today but that approach made UCLA's undermanned/undertalented offense able to make some plays today. It wasn't enough on the road v #7 in the country, but it might make things competitive v Rutgers or Minn or Fresno, and that's progress for this year while this roster is hopefully getting restocked with talent and depth.

Being pleased and being satisfied are two very different things, and it's possible to be pleased (in some areas) with what we saw today while still being wholly dissatisfied with the overall state of things. That's how I'm taking things this year - while not forgetting those who put us in this hole in the first place.

Expand full comment
Grider55's avatar

I thought Martin did fine against that defense in that environment. With our OL, any QB is best on the move; the pocket is ok for short throws, but anything more is dicey. There were times when the D looked pretty solid, but third downs, even long, remain a challenge. A better take-away from this game than Oregon.

Expand full comment
24 more comments...