Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Bruinbaskets's avatar

One other thing to add that baffles me… there are several talks about should ucla win out this week, could they become the new number 1 ranked team… the part that’s baffling though is that all the pundits still have ucla as a number 2 or number three seed in the tournament. I am still of the impression that ucla is fine and can win a natty this year regardless of seeding. It’s just so obnoxious that all of these experts are spouting about number one rankings for teams as follows

Alabama - a 24 point loss to a 13 loss team Oklahoma

Houston - a 1 point home loss to 13 loss temple

Purdue - 1-3 in the last 4 games with a 14 pt loss to Maryland

At least Kansas has only lost to ranked opponents. But three of those losses were by more than 13 points.

UCLA doesn’t have as many q1 wins for sure. They need to win against Arizona to close out the season to solidify my opinion they can win a natty. They also need to win a natty to shut up all the dumb ass experts out there. It’s been too long ucla… make me eat crow for my comments earlier and shut them all up

Expand full comment
Bruinbaskets's avatar

Definitely a strange game. Bailey was pretty awful but I’d hope it’s because he injured his ankle and his first step of power clearly wasn’t there.

Let’s just hope that nwuba and Bailey heal up nicely over the next three weeks as this is the biggest long term problem in my opinion.

The bruins played much better defense to close out the game. Still a few lapses in judgement, but ucla played the last 6-7 minutes with a lineup we never expected to see. They also played large chunks of time with a new lineup. One that I particularly like most was the Clark, jaquez, Andrews, singleton, bona lineup. That appeared to be the lineup that completely baffled stanford. They couldn’t figure out how to score with those five players on the court which is what triggered the first big run in the second half for the bruins

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts