Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Chenalex's avatar

This is a tough loss to take. With Clark and Bona, our defense would’ve kept us in the game during our scoring drought and maybe even ended it earlier if we could’ve gotten fast break points.

Mick in the post game sounded mad. Mad for having to wait nearly 35 minutes before he could begin the conference, mad at the refs, mad at Andrews for not playing Strauther tighter.

Love the heart our team showed down 8. Instead of jacking up 3s like any other team, Jaime mustered up every once of remaining energy he had to drive and get fouled. And cronin made a pretty genius move to foil their worst free throw shooters even when fouling wasn’t necessary and that got us the 1-point lead.

On the final play, it’s understandable why ucla didn’t press. One pass will break the press and then your defense is playing with a man down with only a one point lead. It was clear we were trying to avoid a drive or a foul as we were only up 1 in the double bonus. But sometimes lucky 3 point shots from the logo just go in I guess.

Expand full comment
ArmyBruin's avatar

I think the key stat went unmentioned. We lost the rebounding battle 50-26. We easily could have survived a cold spell if we could have kept them off the offensive glass. They got way too many 2nd chance opportunities. Better rebounding may have led to better offensive opportunities as well. We definitely do not get outrebounded like that with Clark and Bona playing.

Expand full comment
117 more comments...

No posts