Discussion about this post

User's avatar
ArmyBruin's avatar

Help is in the way. Here’s a description of Adem Bona, our incoming center:

“Has a top notch physique with strength and athleticism. Runs like a deer and is an explosive leaper. Has good hands. Finishes lobs with authority and is a high level rebounder. Raw skill wise but shows promise as an attack the basket off a couple dribbles threat and as a respectable jump shooter. Defends and rebounds with passion. Can protect the rim.”

I would suggest looking at his videos. We also have Amari Bailey and Dylan Andrews, two top guards. I will reiterate a point that I often make. Mick Cronin has has very few open slots to recruit to. That’s starting to change. Given the importance of recruiting, I think that we will really start to see what Cronin can do with the program. We need more size and athleticism to compete with the top teams on a regular basis.

Expand full comment
James Harenchar's avatar

Has anyone noticed that the wins with Tyger on the bench were driven by a much more active point presence, faster distribution of the ball and an overall more active offense? Now maybe some of that was quality of the competition, but I don’t think all of it. I’m exhausted watching the grinding offensive sets that start when Tyger walks the ball across half court and Mick’s spread offense has 4 people standing still 25’ from the basket and waiting for a high ball screen. If I can see that, can’t the opposition? To your point about athleticism, Elite teams like Kansas, Baylor, Auburn and Kentucky will run the Bruins out of the gym. The blueprint was set by Gonzaga early in the season vs UCLA. It’s too late in the season to change because that has been Tyger’s style for 3 years so we’re stuck with a game plan predicated on holding opponents to 65 or less and hoping we shoot 34% or higher.

Expand full comment
19 more comments...

No posts